Is the English African American language?

 

In December 1996, national attention in the United States turned to new resolutions passed by the UNIFIED OAKLAND school district (OUSD). The controversial resolution defines what is called "Ebonics" as a separate language of English, so that it is better to meet the population needs of African-American American students who are talking and corrected by teachers who believe it becomes a slang or inappropriate. English. The purpose of the resolution is to familiarize educators with AVE and expand the district bilingual program to make speakers. The decision was filled with a direct counter-attack from politicians - such as Pastor Jesse Jackson, who called the resolution of "unacceptable submission" and "borderlining on disgrace." Less than a month later the Linguistic Society of America unanimously releases a statement that supports the OUSD decision, quoting the systematic nature of Ebonics as a legitimate reason for being recognized as a different linguistic system.

Why did Ebonics like that source of controversy in the 1990s? Is the controversy still there?

Today Ebonics is known as Vernacular English African America (AVE). This is considered by academics to be a specific way to speak in greater categorization of African-American English (AAE), or black English. Aave specifically refers to the form of black speech that distinguishes itself from standard English with unique structure, pronunciation and vocabulary.

The origin of Aave is not clear. Some theories consider AVE as a form that survives in the 18th century English, noting that strict rules that regulate the agreement of work subjects are recent developments and that the syntax of older English matches a modern speech pattern. This idea was supported by the similarity of Aave with the South American accent, which represented the accent of the white servants who enslave Africa working with plantations. Others propose that the Ave matches the grammar structure and pronunciation of Western African and English varieties of Creole, pointing to their respective cultural groups as the origin of Aave.

Regardless of origin, AVE is usually considered negative in a professional room dominated by white, such as politics and academics, in the United States. Historically, Ave has been considered by many sectors of the American society as a sign of lower socio-economic status and a lack of formal education. This perception strongly triggered a counter-attack on Oakland resolution. Today many black people in America face discrimination for the way they speak; Many Aave speakers rely on code switching to actively change the way they talk to different groups. For some people, this is a way to advance a person's career in the dominant white profession, but for others it is a means of survival with police brutality and the impact of the violence of systemic racism.

For supporting language making, language status that stands alone legitimizes the history and systematic nature of Aave and ensures that educators will be better prepared to teach black students. Furthermore, giving language status discusses the lack of knowledge among non-black people about the unique linguistic system and rules of Aave, which is usually considered the wrong transfer of standard English. AVE's legitimacy can also potentially reduce or replace the need for black professionals to constantly rely on the transition code in their careers.

Opponents treat Aave as a language that often quotes it as a symptom of socio-economic conditions and culture of black communities. John McWhorter, a black language expert, stated that the Oakland proposal would not help African-American students because "the city's background did not prepare many children to receive education at school," noting his belief in the differences in education and the cultural environment in Indonesia which used.

The linguistic classification of Aave is still debated among academics, with some who argue that its proximity to English standards makes it dialect English, not a language. The critics of such classification shows the social implications of the subordinating Ave in such a way, citing unique and lexicon aave grammar structures as justification to identify it as a stand-alone language. Some also challenge strategic and unfavorable English language pervasivers. Apart from Aave's status, correct or reject a person's communication inherently discriminatory.

As a Lexicon (e.g., "Tea spont," "Lit," "wake up") made his way into standard English, the debate about Aave status burned in 1996 was still ongoing. Apart from the Precedent of Oakland School Resolution and Academic Opinions from Languists who establish Aave as a significantly historical and cultural linguistic system, many institutions and individuals still consider AVE as a variety of standard English standards damaged and grammar, has a negative impact on quality Education, Liveliho.